LEGAL SECURITY OF THE INFORMATION RESOURCES OF THE NATIONAL AGENCY OF UKRAINE FOR DETECTING, SEARCHING AND MANAGEMENT OF ASSETS OBTAINED FROM CORRUPTION AND OTHER CRIMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33244/2617-4154-2(15)-2024-173-181Keywords:
National Agency of Ukraine for Identification, Search and Management of Assets Obtained from Corruption and Other Crimes (ARMA), information resources, legal acts, Unified State Register of Assets Seized in Criminal Proceedings, informatization, state registersAbstract
The article is devoted to issues of legal provision of ARMA information resources. It was emphasized that the National Agency of Ukraine for Identification, Search and Management of Assets Obtained from Corruption and Other Crimes (ARMA) is a newly created law enforcement body with a special status, whose powers include the identification and search of assets that can be seized in criminal proceedings proceedings, as well as management of these assets. The activity of ARMA implements the doctrine of "intelligence-led policing (ILP of the risk system)" in terms of identifying and searching for assets.
It was concluded that the implementation of modern information technologies in the activities of the National Agency of Ukraine for the identification, search and management of assets obtained from corruption and other crimes is extremely relevant in modern conditions. The use of specialized databases, analytical tools and electronic document management systems will allow the agency to effectively monitor the movement of assets, identify suspicious financial transactions and respond to potential risks in a timely manner. In addition, integration with international information systems will ensure data exchange and coordination of efforts in the fight against transnational crime.
One of the priority activities of ARMA in the future will be the identification, search and management of virtual assets, which will undoubtedly play an important role in replenishing state financial resources.
Digitization of processes will also increase the transparency of the agency's activities, promote accountability to the public, and increase the efficiency of the management of seized assets for the benefit of the state.